Two weeks before Eric and I married in June, 2013, I received an email from a friend who is a Catholic seminarian. In the message, my friend urged me not to proceed with the wedding. His concerns were strongly-worded but heart-felt.
My friend's message forced me to spend extra time articulating the "why" of our wedding and our marriage. Amidst the execution of a million last-minute details of a Manhattan wedding, that email compelled me to articulate how our big day was not the repudiation of my faith but the fulfillment of it.
As a Catholic Christian, having identified the other human being with whom I intended to spend the rest of my life, I was compelled to create a special time and place where our family members and friends would come to pray with us and over us -- while being uplifted by sacred music and hearing from sacred scripture. (Our Liturgy of the Word purposefully began with the chanting of the Taize setting of "Veni Sancte Spiritus.")
As a Catholic Christian, I was compelled to make a public statement of lifelong commitment to the man I loved. (We did so using the prayers and vows of the Church's Rite of Marriage.)
I never expected to find sentiments akin to this in a ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court. But, there they were last week in Justice Anthony Kennedy's majority opinion in Obergefell v. Hodges that has brought marriage equality to ever state in the nation:
The money quote:
" ... Their plea is that they do respect it, respect it so deeply that the seek to find its fulfillment for themselves. ... "
Amen, Justice Kennedy. Amen.
